If you're building production LLM applications, you've probably hit these problems:
- Managing multiple provider APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, AWS, Google)
- Handling provider outages and rate limits
- Tracking costs across different models and providers
- Ensuring security and compliance
AI gateways solve these problems by sitting between your application and LLM providers. One API, multiple providers, built-in failover, cost tracking, and security features.
Here are the 5 AI gateways you should evaluate.
1. Bifrost by Maxim AI
What it is: High-performance AI gateway built for production deployments. Zero config, automatic failover, semantic caching built in.
Why you'd use it:
You need production-ready infrastructure without spending weeks on configuration. Bifrost gives you a unified API for 12+ providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex, Azure, Cohere, Mistral, Ollama, Groq) with automatic failover and load balancing.
Key features:
-
Zero-config startup:
npx -y @maximhq/bifrostand you're running. Add provider keys through the web UI. No YAML files. - Automatic failover: Primary provider down? Requests automatically route to backups. No manual intervention.
- Semantic caching: Intelligent caching based on meaning, not exact text matching. Reduces costs by up to 90% for common queries.
- MCP support: Enable AI models to use external tools (filesystem, web search, databases).
- Budget management: Set spending limits at organization, team, application, and provider levels.
- Drop-in replacement: Change one line of code to migrate from direct OpenAI/Anthropic calls.
maximhq
/
bifrost
Fastest LLM gateway (50x faster than LiteLLM) with adaptive load balancer, cluster mode, guardrails, 1000+ models support & <100 µs overhead at 5k RPS.
Bifrost
The fastest way to build AI applications that never go down
Bifrost is a high-performance AI gateway that unifies access to 15+ providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex, and more) through a single OpenAI-compatible API. Deploy in seconds with zero configuration and get automatic failover, load balancing, semantic caching, and enterprise-grade features.
Quick Start
Go from zero to production-ready AI gateway in under a minute.
Step 1: Start Bifrost Gateway
# Install and run locally
npx -y @maximhq/bifrost
# Or use Docker
docker run -p 8080:8080 maximhq/bifrost
Step 2: Configure via Web UI
# Open the built-in web interface
open http://localhost:8080
Step 3: Make your first API call
curl -X POST http://localhost:8080/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "openai/gpt-4o-mini",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello, Bifrost!"}]
}'
That's it! Your AI gateway is running with a web interface for visual configuration, real-time monitoring…
Setup:
# NPX
npx -y @maximhq/bifrost
# Docker
docker run -p 8080:8080 maximhq/bifrost
Then point your app at http://localhost:8080/v1 instead of the OpenAI endpoint.
Best for: Teams building production AI apps who need reliability and observability without configuration overhead.
Docs: https://docs.getbifrost.ai
2. LiteLLM
What it is: Open-source abstraction layer supporting 100+ LLM providers. Available as Python SDK or proxy server.
Why you'd use it:
You're a platform team building internal LLM infrastructure and you need extensive provider coverage. LiteLLM supports pretty much every LLM provider that exists.
Key features:
- Support for 100+ providers
- Python SDK and proxy server options
- Cost tracking across providers
- Rate limiting and authentication
- Observability integrations (Langfuse, MLflow, Helicone)
Best for: ML platform teams managing multi-provider infrastructure with Python-heavy workflows.
Docs: https://www.litellm.ai/
3. OpenRouter
What it is: Model marketplace providing access to 300+ AI models from 60+ providers through a unified API.
Why you'd use it:
You want to experiment across lots of models without managing provider integrations yourself. OpenRouter handles the provider connections, you just pick models.
Key features:
- Access to 300+ models (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, Llama, Mistral, and more)
- Automatic fallback routing
- Zero Data Retention (ZDR) mode for privacy
- Response healing for malformed JSON
- Pay-as-you-go pricing
Best for: Developers who want model variety and marketplace flexibility, especially for experimentation and prototyping.
Docs: https://openrouter.ai/
4. Cloudflare AI Gateway
What it is: AI request management built on Cloudflare's edge network. Global caching, rate limiting, observability.
Why you'd use it:
You're already using Cloudflare infrastructure and you want edge-optimized caching for global users. Cloudflare's network serves 20% of internet traffic, so they know how to cache and route at scale.
Key features:
- Edge caching reducing latency by up to 90%
- Rate limiting and request retries
- A/B testing across models
- Integration with Cloudflare Workers AI
- Free tier available
Best for: Teams on Cloudflare infrastructure who need global latency optimization through edge caching.
Docs: https://developers.cloudflare.com/ai-gateway/
5. Kong AI Gateway
What it is: Enterprise API management platform extended with AI-specific features. Semantic routing, PII sanitization, automated RAG.
Why you'd use it:
You're an enterprise with existing Kong deployments and you need advanced governance features. Kong brings enterprise API management capabilities to LLM traffic.
Key features:
- Semantic routing across multiple LLMs
- PII sanitization (20+ categories, 12 languages)
- Automated RAG injection
- Token-based throttling
- MCP and agent workflow support
Best for: Enterprises with Kong infrastructure who need compliance features and semantic capabilities.
Docs: https://developer.konghq.com/ai-gateway/
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Bifrost | LiteLLM | OpenRouter | Cloudflare | Kong |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setup | Zero config | Requires config | Zero config | Requires config | Requires config |
| Providers | 12+ | 100+ | 60+ | 20+ | Multiple |
| Semantic Caching | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auto Failover | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self-hosted | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Best For | Production apps | Platform teams | Experimentation | Global latency | Enterprise governance |
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Mistake 1: Picking based on provider count alone. More providers doesn't mean better. Pick based on which providers you actually use.
Mistake 2: Not testing with your actual workload. What works for 100 requests/day breaks at 100,000. Load test before committing.
Mistake 3: Ignoring self-hosting requirements. If you have data residency requirements, cloud-only solutions won't work.
Mistake 4: Not monitoring actual provider usage. You configure failover but don't track which provider is handling requests. Always monitor.
Ready to get started? Bifrost setup guide


Top comments (0)