If you're working with Entity Framework Core and wondering why your read-heavy operations feel sluggish, you might be paying a hidden performance cost: change tracking overhead.
The Problem
By default, EF Core tracks every entity it retrieves from the database. This tracking mechanism monitors changes to entities so that when you call SaveChanges(), EF Core knows exactly what to update. While powerful for CRUD operations, this comes with memory and CPU overheadโespecially problematic when you're just reading data.
The Solution: AsNoTracking()
The AsNoTracking() method tells EF Core: "I'm only reading this data, don't track changes." This eliminates tracking overhead and can significantly improve performance for read-only scenarios.
Code Examples
1๏ธโฃ Basic Query with AsNoTracking()
2๏ธโฃ Comparing Tracking vs No-Tracking Behavior
3๏ธโฃ Performance Use-Case: API Endpoints & Dashboards
4๏ธโฃ When NOT to Use AsNoTracking()
5๏ธโฃ AsNoTrackingWithIdentityResolution()
Key Benefits
โ
Performance: 10-30% faster queries in read-heavy scenarios
โ
Memory: Reduced memory footprintโno tracking metadata stored
โ
Scalability: Better throughput for high-volume read operations
โ
Simplicity: One method call for immediate gains
Best Practices
๐น Use AsNoTracking() for:
Read-only API endpoints
Reports and dashboards
Data export operations
Search and filtering queries
๐น Avoid AsNoTracking() when:
You need to update entities afterward
Working with complex object graphs where identity matters
The performance gain is negligible (very small result sets)
๐น Global Configuration:
๐น Use AsNoTrackingWithIdentityResolution() when you need proper entity identity without tracking overhead (EF Core 5.0+)
The Bottom Line
If you're querying data without modifying it, you're probably paying for tracking you don't need. Add .AsNoTracking() to your read queries and watch your application's performance improve.






Top comments (0)