DEV Community

SANKET PATIL
SANKET PATIL

Posted on

Angular Architecture That Clicks: Embracing Feature-Based Design

Structuring an Angular app may seem straightforward at first-just put components in one folder, services in another, and models in their own. But as projects grow, that neat separation can quickly turn into a maze of files.

Reflecting on a recent project, I realized how much time I wasted bouncing between folders just to make a small change in one feature. Thatโ€™s when I decided to shift from the type-based structure to a feature-based design-and it completely changed how I build and maintain Angular apps.

In this post, Iโ€™ll walk you through why this shift clicked for me, the challenges it solved, and how it makes apps more modular and scalable.


๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Challenges with Type-Based Structure
At first, the default structure looked clean:

/components  
/services  
/models  
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

But real-world development quickly exposed its flaws:

  • Scattered Logic: Updating a single feature meant editing files across multiple folders.
  • Onboarding Pain: New developers struggled to trace what belonged to which feature.
  • Scaling Issues: As features grew, so did the complexity of managing cross-folder dependencies.

๐Ÿ”„ The Shift to Feature-Based Design
Instead of grouping files by type, I started grouping them by feature:

/features  
   /dashboard  
      dashboard.component.ts  
      dashboard.service.ts  
      dashboard.module.ts  
   /user  
      user.component.ts  
      user.service.ts  
      user.model.ts  
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Everything related to โ€œUserโ€ now lives in one place. Need to update user logic? Itโ€™s all inside /user. Want to add a new feature? Create a new folder and keep it self-contained.


๐Ÿš€ Benefits I Experienced
The difference was immediate:

  • Modularity โ†’ Features became self-contained, easier to maintain, and simpler to test.
  • Scalability โ†’ Features could be lazy-loaded, reducing initial bundle size.
  • Collaboration โ†’ Teams could work on different features in parallel with minimal conflicts.
  • Clarity โ†’ The structure told a story. Even new developers instantly knew where to look.

๐Ÿ“– Lessons Learned
Making the switch taught me a few key lessons:

  1. Align with Angularโ€™s Strengths: Angular is inherently module-driven, so a feature-based structure plays to its strengths.
  2. Think in Features, Not Files: Real-world applications evolve around features, not isolated file types.
  3. Refactor Early: The earlier you move to feature-based design, the less painful the transition.

๐Ÿ Conclusion
Shifting to feature-based design wasnโ€™t just a structural change-it was a mindset shift. By organizing code around features instead of file types, I cut down development time, reduced confusion, and made the codebase far more modular.

If youโ€™re still working with a type-based Angular structure, I encourage you to try the feature-based approach. Like me, you might find it just clicks.

Hereโ€™s to building modular, scalable, and developer-friendly Angular apps ๐Ÿš€

Top comments (0)