This is a submission for the GitHub Copilot CLI Challenge
What I Built
MuleSoft Package Validator - An automated quality assurance and security validation tool for MuleSoft integration projects.
As a MuleSoft developer, I faced a recurring problem: manual code reviews were time-consuming (2+ hours per project) and inconsistent. Security vulnerabilities like hardcoded credentials would slip through to production, and orphaned flows bloated our applications. I built this CLI tool to solve these real-world challenges.
The Problem It Solves
- 🔐 Security risks: Detects hardcoded passwords, API keys, JWT tokens across YAML, XML, and POM files
- 📊 Code quality: Enforces naming conventions, flow complexity limits, and best practices
- 🔍 Dead code: Identifies orphaned flows, unused configurations, and unreferenced components
- 📦 Dependencies: Validates Maven dependencies and build sizes
- ⚡ Time savings: Reduces validation from 2+ hours to under 2 minutes
Key Features
- Multi-layer security scanning with context-aware detection
- Flow and component complexity analysis
- Orphan detection (unused flows, configs, properties)
- Dependency management and build size validation
- Beautiful HTML reports with actionable insights
- Batch processing for multiple projects
- 171 comprehensive tests (85% coverage)
Demo
🎬 Quick Start Demo
# Clone and validate in under 60 seconds
git clone https://github.com/venkat-training/mulesoft_package_validator.git
cd mulesoft_package_validator
pip install -r requirements.txt
pip install -e .
# Test on included sample project
python -m mule_validator_cli --project ./samples/sample-mule-project
📊 Sample Output
================================================================================
VALIDATION REPORT
================================================================================
--- SECURITY WARNINGS ---
⚠️ YAML Secret detected in config-prod.yaml
Location: database.password
Value: "hardcoded_password_123"
⚠️ API key detected in config-dev.yaml
Location: api.key
--- FLOW VALIDATION ---
✅ Flows: 8 (limit: 100)
⚠️ Invalid flow names: bad-flow, hello-worldFlow
--- ORPHAN DETECTION ---
⚠️ 6 orphaned flows found
⚠️ 16 unused property keys
TOTAL WARNINGS: 22
Report generated: validation_report.html
================================================================================
🔗 Links
- GitHub Repository: https://github.com/venkat-training/mulesoft_package_validator
- Sample Reports: Check out pre-generated validation reports
- Live Sample Project: Included in repo with intentional issues for testing
📸 Screenshots
HTML Validation Report
Orphan Detection Report
My Experience with GitHub Copilot CLI
GitHub Copilot CLI transformed my development experience from day one. Here's how:
1. Test Generation (Saved ~15 hours)
The most impactful use was generating comprehensive test fixtures. Instead of manually crafting XML structures for 171 tests:
gh copilot suggest "generate pytest fixtures for XML parsing with multiple mule config files including flows, sub-flows, error handlers, and loggers"
Copilot generated:
@pytest.fixture
def sample_mule_config():
return """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mule xmlns="http://www.mulesoft.org/schema/mule/core">
<flow name="testFlow">
<logger message="test"/>
</flow>
</mule>"""
@pytest.fixture
def complex_flow_config():
# Multiple flows with various components
# Error handlers, sub-flows, etc.
Impact: What would have taken me 2-3 hours of tedious XML writing was done in 10 minutes. I then focused on test logic rather than boilerplate.
2. Security Pattern Detection (Saved ~5 hours)
Building the security scanner required complex regex patterns:
gh copilot suggest "python regex patterns to detect JWT tokens, API keys, base64 encoded secrets, and AWS credentials in YAML files"
Copilot provided:
JWT_PATTERN = r'eyJ[A-Za-z0-9_-]+\.eyJ[A-Za-z0-9_-]+\.[A-Za-z0-9_-]+'
API_KEY_PATTERN = r'[a-zA-Z0-9]{32,}|sk_[a-z]+_[A-Za-z0-9]{32,}'
AWS_KEY_PATTERN = r'AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}'
These patterns became the core of my security scanner. I refined them, but the foundation saved hours of regex research and testing.
3. Error Handling Patterns
When dealing with malformed XML files:
gh copilot explain "How should I handle XML parsing errors in lxml when config files might be malformed"
Copilot suggested:
try:
tree = etree.parse(xml_file)
except etree.XMLSyntaxError as e:
return {"error": f"XML syntax error: {str(e)}"}
except Exception as e:
return {"error": f"Unexpected error: {str(e)}"}
This pattern became my standard error handling template throughout the project.
4. Documentation Generation (Saved ~8 hours)
gh copilot suggest "Generate comprehensive README sections for a Python CLI tool that validates MuleSoft packages including installation, usage examples, and troubleshooting"
Copilot created the initial README structure that I refined. It included sections I hadn't considered (like Windows PATH configuration issues), which ended up being critical for users.
5. Library-Specific Syntax
When working with lxml XPath queries:
gh copilot suggest "lxml xpath to find all flow elements with name attribute in mule namespace"
flows = root.xpath('.//mule:flow[@name]', namespaces=NAMESPACES)
This saved me countless trips to documentation and StackOverflow.
💡 Key Takeaways
Where Copilot CLI Excelled:
- ✅ Boilerplate generation: Test fixtures, mock data, standard patterns
- ✅ Pattern suggestions: Regex, XPath, error handling templates
- ✅ Library syntax: Quick answers for lxml, PyYAML, pytest
- ✅ Documentation structure: Comprehensive README outline
- ✅ Edge case handling: Suggested scenarios I hadn't considered
Where Human Judgment Was Essential:
- 🧠 Architecture decisions: Module organization, validation flow
- 🧠 Domain expertise: MuleSoft-specific validation rules
- 🧠 User experience: CLI argument design, report formatting
- 🧠 Testing strategy: What scenarios to test, assertion design
📊 Productivity Metrics
- Total Development Time: 40 hours
- Time Saved by Copilot CLI: ~15 hours (38% reduction)
- Tests Written: 171 (85% with Copilot assistance)
- Lines of Code: 3,500+
- Documentation Pages: Wrote 80% faster with Copilot
Technical Highlights
Architecture
CLI Entry Point
├── Flow Validator (naming, complexity)
├── Security Scanner (YAML, POM, XML)
├── Orphan Detector (unused components)
├── Dependency Analyzer (Maven validation)
├── Config Validator (YAML syntax)
└── Report Generators (HTML, Console)
Technology Stack
- Python 3.8+ with lxml, PyYAML
- 171 pytest tests (85% coverage)
- HTML/CSS for beautiful reports
- Maven integration for dependency checks
Real-World Impact
After deploying this tool in my team:
- ✅ Zero hardcoded secrets reached production (down from ~2 per month)
- ✅ Build sizes reduced 15% on average (detected unused dependencies)
- ✅ 40% fewer orphaned flows in new projects
- ✅ Code review time cut from 2 hours to 15 minutes
Try It Yourself!
Quick Start
git clone https://github.com/venkat-training/mulesoft_package_validator.git
cd mulesoft_package_validator
pip install -r requirements.txt
pip install -e .
# Run on sample project
python -m mule_validator_cli --project ./samples/sample-mule-project --output report.html
What You'll See
The sample project includes intentional issues:
- Hardcoded passwords and API keys
- Invalid flow names (bad-flow, INVALIDFLOW123)
- 6 orphaned flows
- Excessive logging
- Unused dependencies
Perfect for testing the validator's capabilities!
Full Documentation
Check out the comprehensive README with:
- Installation guide (including Windows PATH setup)
- Usage examples (CLI and Python API)
- Sample reports and test project
- Troubleshooting guide
- Contributing guidelines
Lessons Learned
1. Start with Copilot CLI for Patterns, Not Architecture
I initially tried using Copilot to design my entire module structure. It gave generic advice. Instead, I found it excelled at generating specific patterns once I knew what I needed:
- "Generate regex for JWT tokens" ✅
- "Design validation architecture" ❌
2. Test Fixtures Are Perfect for AI
The most productivity gain came from test generation. Tests follow predictable patterns, making them ideal for Copilot:
- Fixture structure is repetitive
- Edge cases follow templates
- Mock data needs variety but patterns
3. Iterate on Copilot's Output
Copilot CLI rarely gives production-ready code on the first try. But it gives you a 95% solution that you can refine. This is still far faster than starting from scratch.
4. Combine Copilot with Domain Expertise
The best results came when I combined:
- Copilot's knowledge: Python patterns, library syntax, common practices
- My expertise: MuleSoft-specific rules, security requirements, user needs
What's Next?
Future enhancements I'm planning:
- GitHub Actions integration for CI/CD pipelines
- VS Code extension for real-time validation
- Custom rule engine for team-specific standards
- Real-time validation with file watchers
Acknowledgments
- Built with ❤️ for the MuleSoft developer community
- Powered by GitHub Copilot CLI (saved 15+ hours of development time!)
- Inspired by real-world integration challenges at scale
⭐ If you find this useful, please star the repo!
GitHub: https://github.com/venkat-training/mulesoft_package_validator
Thanks for reading! Questions or feedback? Drop a comment below or open an issue on GitHub.


Top comments (1)
Good to see 267 downloads in pepy.tech portal. for this package. Thanks folks.